Snyder,Inc.

Organizational Development and Education Research Division


David P.Snyder Tel: 252.747.1339  
Chairman and CEO  Cell:919.920.0551  
WWW.mindread.net   dsnyder@mindread.net


Newsflash:
  David Snyder's book How To Mind Read Your Customers, published by AMACOM (the American Management Association) has just been listed First in Sales and Marketing Management Magazine's Top Five Best New Business Books (May Issue, 2001.)  

SACS Assessment Simplified

"David's program is comprehensive. It appeals to faculty because it applies to learning. It appeals to administrators because it works for all curricula, across diverse platforms.  It helps instructors increase quality of instruction and it allows learning outcomes to be tracked.  And it allows an assessment process to be accomplished in much less time than any of us ever imagined possible.   In addition to this, as if the preceding isn't enough, it has created a platform for initiating and sustaining complete campus dialogue and teamwork in the quality enhancement process. And miracle of miracles, it is also inexpensive, especially in the long-term."

 

                                                            

Dr. Ron Wright, President for Academic Programs
Cleveland Community College  
wright@cleveland.cc.nc.us
 
Telephone: 704.484.4093  

  Dear Educator:

  I am writing to share with you some information regarding my company's development of an assessment tool to help schools and colleges meet the new assessment mandates of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS).

Dr. Ronald Wright, Vice President for Academic Programs at Cleveland Community College, has joined our efforts at Snyder,Inc. as a program development partner, after seeing our critical thinking and technical writing program achieve results for his faculty.  Dr. Wright will be helping us to insure that every aspect of our measurement tools and process specifically meets the numerous procedural guidelines required by the state.

In brief, we feel (and Dr. Wright can confirm this) that we have taken what might be a 500-page assessment chore and boiled it down to an assessment process that could be tracked using a simple and brief measurement tool that will yield a simple and easily-compiled report.

 

The Big Picture

SACS guidelines are lengthy, but these extracts from the guidebook for colleges cover the major points.  

"The institution must have a clearly defined process by which the curriculum is established, reviewed and evaluated.  The process must recognize the various roles of the faculty, the administration and the governing board.

"Instructional techniques and policies must be in accord with the purpose of the institution and be appropriate to the specific goals of an individual course. Instruction must be evaluated regularly and the results used to ensure quality instruction."

 

Challenges  

The challenge facing most education leaders is obvious--SACS has given mandates for schools and colleges to "raise the bar" with regard to continuous process improvement and integration of curriculum development and assessment, but no guidelines on how the process should be coordinated have been offered.  It is being left up to the individual institutions to design their own processes.

 

Solutions

Our assessment program is unified.  First it, involves the incorporation of staff development programs to help instructors to weave simple critical thinking and scientific/technical writing exercises into their classrooms.  The exercises help students learn the technical writing skills they will need for the real world, while at the same time boosting their critical thinking/reading comprehension abilities.  

Second, we use a simple tracking sheet to insure that all programs or courses contain a two-part list of mirrored core competencies: one side of the list contains all of the subject competencies that every department has agreed are important for program or course completion; the second part of the list contains all of the application areas that students should be expected to competently write about, if asked, in a brief technical essay.  

Expectations for how many subject and application areas students must be able to convincingly describe in technical essays are established for three parts of the measurement process:  

  1. Ongoing.

  2. End of course.  

  3. End of program.

Third, cohort criteria are established so that effectiveness in teaching can easily be tracked according to teacher, program, department, type of student, or any other important variable.

 

Fourth, we have developed a second assessment tool where student feedback can be used comparatively to assess the accuracy and implications of the data collected from educators.

Fifth, we have constructed a simple process whereby all the information described above can be used to improve the quality of instruction and classroom experience.  

Sixth, we provide assistance in writing up the results of the process described above to meet SACS assessment deadlines.

 

Next Steps  

Educators who are interested in this process are advised to first call Dr. Ronald Wright at Cleveland Community College to see whether the proposed program might meet their needs.  His number is 704.484.4093. His email is wright@cleveland.cc.nc.us.  

Other references about the quality of our work include Steve Mazingo, superintendent of Greene County Schools.  He can be reached at 252.747.1339. Or you can email him at steve@greene.k12.nc.us.  

 

If after contacting these people for references you feel that you need more information or would like to book an initial consultation, please email me at dsnyder@mindread.net.

 

Thank you for your interest.

            Cordially,

            DAVID P. SNYDER

          David Snyder  
          dsnyder@mindread.net
          www.mindread.net
          252.747.1339